Valuing Lived Experience: Building the Evidence for Better Care in Pernicious Anaemia
Published in Healthcare & Nursing, Social Sciences, and General & Internal Medicine
Explore the Research
Patient-reported characteristics of pernicious anaemia: a first step to initiate James Lind Alliance Priority Setting Partnership driven research
The story behind the research
Pernicious anaemia (PA) is a lifelong autoimmune disease leading to severe B12 deficiency. Despite being manageable with regular treatment, it often remains under-recognised and inconsistently managed in clinical practice. This led to the James Lind Alliance Priority Setting Partnership uniting patients, carers, and clinicians to identify the most urgent unanswered questions. At the top of the list were how to improve diagnosis, to understand why symptoms often persist despite treatment, and to explore individual treatment needs.
Working in partnership with the Pernicious Anaemia Society (PAS) and the University of Surrey, and in collaboration with national and international experts, we aimed to turn lived experience into research. Using insights shared by people with PA through PAS, we co-designed a large-scale survey to capture real-world patterns in diagnosis, testing, treatment, and co-existing conditions.
Through PAS, hundreds of people had already described years of unexplained symptoms, repeated misdiagnoses, and ongoing struggles even after diagnosis, as symptoms returned between injections and treatment differed from one practice to the next.
Key findings
- Diagnosis is delayed. More than one in three people waited at least three years to receive a diagnosis, and one in four waited five years or longer.
- Testing was inconsistent. Only 38% had ever been tested for the key biomarker intrinsic factor antibodies.
- Treatment is variable. Just over half reported a need for more frequent injections than the recommended injections 2-3 monthly schedule (as stated in the British National Formulary), supporting that the “one-size-fits-all” is not appropriate
- Comorbidities were common. About one-third had another autoimmune disease, such as autoimmune thyroid disease or vitiligo. Around 40% also reported iron deficiency.
- Family patterns emerged. Nearly one-third had at least one other family member with PA, and nearly 50% had family members with another autoimmune condition.
These findings highlight that PA presents in diverse ways and cannot be managed through a single diagnostic or treatment pathways.
Why does it matter?
For clinicians, our findings highlight the need to revisit how PA is diagnosed and managed. Early recognition, appropriate testing, and flexible treatment intervals could make a real difference to patient wellbeing.
For people living with PA, the study validates lived experience. It confirms that delayed diagnosis and fluctuating symptoms are not isolated cases, but rather systemic challenges. It also highlights the need for improved life-long therapy and management protocols.
For researchers, the dataset provides a foundation for future research, supporting studies on genetics, multi-morbidity, and studies on symptom trajectories that can help move towards more precision medicine-based care.
This study also shows the power of partnership between researchers and people with lived experience, whose insights shaped every stage of the project, from survey design to interpretation of the results.
What comes next...
This study represents the first step in a wider research programme shaped by the James Lind Alliance priorities. Ongoing projects are now exploring better ways to monitor symptoms using smart-watch technology and developing more precise, holistic and diverse treatment, management and follow-up approaches for people with pernicious anaemia.
Follow the Topic
-
BMC Primary Care
Previously known as BMC Family Practice, this is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of primary health care research.
Your space to connect: The Primary immunodeficiency disorders Hub
A new Communities’ space to connect, collaborate, and explore research on Clinical Medicine, Immunology, and Diseases!
Continue reading announcementRelated Collections
With Collections, you can get published faster and increase your visibility.
Primary care workforce and systems
BMC Primary Care is calling for submissions to our Collection, Primary care workforce and systems. The primary care workforce is integral to the healthcare system, serving as the first point of contact for individuals seeking medical attention. This Collection aims to explore the dynamics of the primary care workforce, including its composition, distribution, and the systems that support it. As healthcare needs evolve, understanding the role of healthcare providers and the models of primary care delivery is essential for ensuring quality care and improving health outcomes across diverse populations.
Addressing the challenges faced by the primary care workforce, such as shortages and burnout, is crucial for enhancing patient access to essential services. Recent advancements in integrated care models and innovative workforce strategies have shown promise in mitigating these issues. By focusing on enhancing training, retention, and support for primary care providers, we can improve the overall efficiency and effectiveness of healthcare delivery, ultimately benefiting patients and communities alike.
In this Collection, we welcome submissions that span a wide array of topics, including but not limited to:
-Strategies for addressing workforce shortages
-Innovative primary care models
-Enhancing patient access to primary care
-Integrated care approaches
All manuscripts submitted to this journal, including those submitted to collections and special issues, are assessed in line with our editorial policies and the journal’s peer review process. Reviewers and editors are required to declare competing interests and can be excluded from the peer review process if a competing interest exists.
Publishing Model: Open Access
Deadline: Feb 20, 2026
Physiotherapists as first contact practitioners
BMC Primary Care is calling for submissions to our Collection Physiotherapists as first contact practitioners. Physiotherapists acting in this role are gaining increasing recognition in the landscape of primary healthcare. This shift acknowledges the capabilities of physiotherapists to assess, diagnose, and manage conditions, allowing patients to access care more efficiently. In various healthcare systems around the world, physiotherapists are now positioned at the frontline of patient interaction, often serving as the initial point of contact for individuals seeking treatment for pain or injury. This Collection aims to explore the implications of this evolving role and its potential impact on healthcare delivery.
Ongoing research supports new models of care that capitalize on the expertise of physiotherapists as first contact practitioners. This may include the development of enhanced training programs, the establishment of standardized protocols for diagnosis and treatment, and innovative approaches to collaborative care. Such advancements could ultimately lead to improved patient satisfaction, health outcomes, and overall efficiency in healthcare delivery.
In this Collection, we welcome submissions that span a wide array of topics, including but not limited to:
- Outcomes of physiotherapy as first contact care
- Training requirements for first contact physiotherapists
- Integration of physiotherapy in primary care
- Telehealth applications in physiotherapy practice
All manuscripts submitted to this journal, including those submitted to collections and special issues, are assessed in line with our editorial policies and the journal’s peer-review process. Reviewers and editors are required to declare competing interests and can be excluded from the peer review process if a competing interest exists.
Publishing Model: Open Access
Deadline: Dec 18, 2025
Please sign in or register for FREE
If you are a registered user on Research Communities by Springer Nature, please sign in