What’s Missing in Current Designs for Protonic Ceramic Steam Electrolysis?

Why do successful anode designs in traditional oxygen-ion-conducting solid oxide electrolysis cells fail when applied to protonic ceramic cells for steam electrolysis, despite sharing similar electrode materials?

Published in Chemistry and Materials

What’s Missing in Current Designs for Protonic Ceramic Steam Electrolysis?
Like

Share this post

Choose a social network to share with, or copy the URL to share elsewhere

This is a representation of how your post may appear on social media. The actual post will vary between social networks

Our recent Perspective, titled “Critical insights into the steam electrolysis electrode in protonic ceramic cells for hydrogen production” published in Nature Catalysis, originated from noticing a key oversight in designing anodes—also known as oxygen electrodes—for protonic ceramic electrolysis cells (PCECs). Despite promising efficient hydrogen production at intermediate temperatures, PCECs often borrow successful electrode designs from traditional oxygen-ion-conducting solid oxide electrolysis cells (SOECs), ignoring critical differences—particularly, proton-coupled electron transfer (PCET) mechanisms and the harsh realities of high steam concentrations.

We realized that established strategies from SOECs don’t necessarily apply directly to PCECs. The high steam environments and proton transfer—factors absent in the oxygen electrodes of SOECs—significantly alter oxygen electrode stability and catalytic performance. Our aim was to clearly highlight why SOEC-derived designs frequently fail and to provide guiding principles tailored specifically for PCECs.

Exploring deeper, we found that traditional catalytic descriptors didn’t adequately capture the unique challenges posed by PCET. For oxygen electrode in PCECs, protons are actively involved in electron transfer, fundamentally altering reaction pathways compared to SOEC environments. This insight highlighted a major gap in understanding electrode stability and catalytic behavior in PCECs. The aggressive steam environments also pose significant challenges to material stability. One primary concern is the increased susceptibility to surface degradation due to the combination of high temperature and steam concentration.

Moving forward, we’re excited to expand on these insights by developing electrodes that can thrive in real-world conditions, leveraging operando characterizations and machine-learning-enhanced simulations. This is just the beginning of a journey that we believe could significantly advance hydrogen technology.

The design principles aim to enhance the catalytic activity of oxygen electrode while maintaining stability under high steam concentrations.

The design principles aim to enhance the catalytic activity of oxygen electrode while maintaining stability under high steam concentrations.

Please sign in or register for FREE

If you are a registered user on Research Communities by Springer Nature, please sign in

Follow the Topic

Materials for Energy and Catalysis
Physical Sciences > Materials Science > Materials for Energy and Catalysis
Hydrogen Energy
Physical Sciences > Chemistry > Industrial Chemistry > Hydrogen Energy
Electrocatalysis
Physical Sciences > Materials Science > Materials for Energy and Catalysis > Electrocatalysis
  • Nature Catalysis Nature Catalysis

    This journal brings together researchers from across all chemistry and related fields, publishing work on homogeneous catalysis, heterogeneous catalysis, and biocatalysts, incorporating both fundamental and applied studies.