Where architectural thermo-responsive windows shine

Windows may only cover a small portion of a building's surface, but are responsible for a significant amount of thermal energy transmission. Our research challenges common assumptions and demonstrates that thermo-responsive windows are most beneficial in climates with both heating and cooling needs.
Published in Civil Engineering
Where architectural thermo-responsive windows shine
Like

Share this post

Choose a social network to share with, or copy the URL to share elsewhere

This is a representation of how your post may appear on social media. The actual post will vary between social networks

It is probably hard to believe that windows, covering just 8% of a building’s surface, are responsible for 45% of thermal energy transmission through building envelopes and contribute to 8.6% of total energy use in buildings. That’s a staggering impact, especially considering buildings themselves account for 36% of global primary energy demand. In material science, the race to develop advanced, energy-saving window materials has never stopped. Smart window is a hot topic in research, with countless papers showcasing innovative materials that promise to revolutionize energy efficiency. But how close are we to realizing these bold claims?

Among the many types of dynamic windows, thermo-responsive windows are notable for their unique ability to adapt to temperature changes. Those windows automatically turn dark when it’s hot, and turn clear when it’s cold, thus better utilizing solar radiation and saving the heating and cooling energy. The key to their efficiency lies in a finely tuned transition temperature—aligning the solar heat gain with the building energy demand. Yet, previous research often leans on two questionable assumptions: first, that room temperature is the default optimal transition point, and second, that thermo-responsive windows are most effective in hot climates, where energy savings are presumed to outpace those in mixed or cold regions. Are these assumptions as solid as they seem?

In our recently published study, we conducted over 2.8 million simulations across more than 2,000 locations worldwide to delve into the energy performance of thermo-responsive windows. Our findings reveal that these dynamic windows are particularly beneficial in regions where both heating and cooling are essential, rather than in predominantly hot climates that rely mainly on cooling. In such warm areas, thermo-responsive windows with optimal transition temperatures tend to remain consistently dark, yielding energy performance comparable to that of comparable static tinted windows.

Interestingly, we also discovered that a room temperature of 25 °C (77 °F) isn't always the ideal transition temperature for these windows. The optimal transition temperature is influenced by a variety of factors, including the local climate, the specific type of window, building configurations, and notably, the intrinsic optical properties of the thermo-responsive materials—especially their solar transmittance in the clear state.

Untold Stories: The Research Journey

Our study began as part of a collaborative project with a national laboratory. They provided a thermochromic material, and our task was to evaluate its potential for improving building energy efficiency under different climatic conditions. Initially, we only simulated how this single material performed in three different climate zones. The results aligned with previous findings, indicating that energy savings were greatest in tropical regions. However, we did not stop there. In a departure from past approaches, we greatly expanded the range of the phase transition temperatures, and ultimately overturn what had long been considered a well-established conclusion. We then leveraged machine learning techniques to transform our scattered, discrete results from locations around the world into a visually continuous global map—an outcome not easily achieved through conventional methods.

What sets this study apart from previous material research is its objective, unified evaluation of the necessity for different materials. While earlier studies tended to focus on a single material and highlight its advantages in a specific parameter over other materials, our work takes a broader view, providing a consistent assessment that encompasses a range of materials and their relative importance. Sometimes, demonstrating that a material or technology is not well-suited for an application is itself a significant scientific contribution, as it prevents the unnecessary waste of materials and human resources.

Take home message

There’s no one-size-fits-all solution for thermo-responsive windows. In fact, our findings show that thermo-responsive windows aren’t always necessary in most hot climates. However, when the material properties are carefully selected and the building locations are thoughtfully chosen, thermo-responsive windows can deliver real energy savings. High clear-state solar transmittance, for example, can boost efficiency and shift the ideal transition temperature. To help researchers and designers navigate these nuances, we introduced simple metrics and a mapping tool, making it easier to pinpoint where and how nuances windows truly shine.

Please sign in or register for FREE

If you are a registered user on Research Communities by Springer Nature, please sign in

Follow the Topic

Building Materials
Technology and Engineering > Civil Engineering > Building Materials
Sustainable Architecture/Green Buildings
Technology and Engineering > Civil Engineering > Building Construction and Design > Sustainable Architecture/Green Buildings

Related Collections

With collections, you can get published faster and increase your visibility.

Antimicrobial resistance: a silent pandemic

With this collection, Nature Communications, Nature Medicine, Communications Medicine and Scientific Reports aim to publish research articles spanning the breadth of AMR and across microbial pathogens (bacteria, viruses, fungi and parasites). This includes, and is not limited to epidemiological monitoring of resistance incidence in clinical and environmental settings, novel strategies aiming to combat or prevent AMR (i.e. drug repurposing, drug synergy treatment, and vaccines), improvements in diagnostics, and subsequently tailored treatment, of drug-resistant infections.

Publishing Model: Hybrid

Deadline: Mar 31, 2025

Carbon dioxide removal, capture and storage

In this cross-journal Collection, we bring together studies that address novel and existing carbon dioxide removal and carbon capture and storage methods and their potential for up-scaling, including critical questions of timing, location, and cost. We also welcome articles on methodologies that measure and verify the climate and environmental impact and explore public perceptions.

Publishing Model: Open Access

Deadline: Mar 22, 2025