About Luciana Christante
As a Senior Publisher, I manage a portfolio of Life Sciences journals spanning agriculture, plant sciences, and ecology. I have over ten years of experience in academic publishing, supported by a background in neuroscience and science journalism.
Recent Comments
Thank you, Luciana, for such a clear and thoughtful summary of our review. You've captured the central tension well — that the implementation deficit is institutional, not epistemic. This distinction matters a great deal for small-scale fisheries contexts globally, where fishers routinely hold multi-decadal knowledge of stock and habitat change that formal monitoring simply doesn't reach.
Dear Ravindra, congratulations for such an important work and thank you for publishing with us!
I will loke to contribute to this
If your research work fits into the collection scope - https://link.springer.com/collections/fghhfbeega - your submission is very welcome!
I also really like this shift from ‘genes versus lifestyle’ to ‘genes × lifestyle’. To me, this is much closer to how risk actually emerges in real populations: genetic background does not operate in isolation, but through its interaction with behavior and environment. That move away from genetic determinism toward a more dynamic, context-dependent view of risk is especially valuable.
Thanks for your comment, Olena. I totally agree. Genes do not act in a vacuum. Their effects are shaped by the environment and by our behaviors.
Interisting. Would this be valid for microplastics in terrestrial environments/soil as well?
thank you so much for your reply, @Akeem Adeyemi Oladipo!
Interisting. Would this be valid for microplastics in terrestrial environments/soil as well?