The Evolutionary Game of Alpha-helical Protein Residues

Game theory is a mathematical framework originally developed in economics to understand how rational “players” make decisions when their outcomes depend on each other. The same mathematical rules can also describe proteins' residue interactions.

Published in Cancer, Chemistry, and Ecology & Evolution

Like

Share this post

Choose a social network to share with, or copy the URL to share elsewhere

This is a representation of how your post may appear on social media. The actual post will vary between social networks

Explore the Research

SpringerLink
SpringerLink SpringerLink

Co-evolution of alpha-helical transmembrane protein residues: large-scale variant profiling and complete mutational landscape of 2277 known PDB entries representing 504 unique human protein sequences - Journal of Molecular Evolution

Membrane proteins play fundamental roles in cellular function, yet the evolutionary dynamics of their amino acid composition remain poorly understood. Our current study investigates the substitutional landscape and evolutionary patterns of hydrophilic and hydrophobic residues in membrane α-helical proteins, addressing a significant gap in our knowledge of protein evolution. We analyzed 2277 high-resolution protein structures from the RCSB Protein Data Bank corresponding to 458 unique PDB structures, 504 UniProt transmembrane entries and their AlphaMissense predicted mutational libraries including more than 5.8 million amino acid substitutions, focusing on known transmembrane α-helical proteins in Homo sapiens. Our analysis showed that the pathological outcome of the substitutions is diverse, as nonpolar to polar changes showed higher pathological scores in general. Notably, F <=> Y substitutions showed significantly lower pathological scores. Our further analysis revealed a significant asymmetry in the evolutionary frequencies of polar and nonpolar amino acids. We identified key residue pairs driving this asymmetry, with F <=> Y, A <=> T, V <=> T and A <=> S co-evolution diverging from the expected negative correlations (Spearman’s rho > 0.20, p < 0.001). The V <=> T substitution via an alanine intermediate and the G <=> N substitution via a serine intermediate lower their statistical barrier, which would otherwise require two sequential base changes. We propose two evolutionary game theory (EGT) based models to explain their diversification, with partial correlation analysis on residue frequencies in homolog sequences. These mathematical insights suggest a previously unrecognized evolutionary pressure, potentially linked to functional diversification, which could be targeted to combat drug resistance. Our results offer insights into membrane protein evolution and may inform improved methods for protein structure prediction and design.

Check our full behind the paper story here: https://go.nature.com/3KnbhdB

Our interest in membrane proteins began with a practical challenge: how do you study proteins that are so hard to solubilize and crystallize? Hydrophobic α-helices hide in membranes, making structural work notoriously difficult. In our early work on the QTY code, we asked: can we swap hydrophobic residues (L, I, V, F) with polar ones (Q, T, Y) in neurological transporters to make them soluble without disrupting their helices?

Surprisingly, the answer was yes (Zhang et al. PNAS 2018; Karagöl et al. Pharm Res 2024; Karagöl et al. PLOS One 2024a; Johnsson et al. 2025). The substitutions preserved fold and even function, showing that evolution tolerates more flexibility than textbooks suggest. This raised a deeper question: could evolution itself exploit similar hydrophobic–polar swaps to diversify function, adapt to environments, or buffer harmful mutations?

Please sign in or register for FREE

If you are a registered user on Research Communities by Springer Nature, please sign in

Follow the Topic

Cancer Biology
Life Sciences > Biological Sciences > Cancer Biology
Evolutionary Theory
Life Sciences > Biological Sciences > Evolutionary Biology > Evolutionary Theory
Biochemistry
Physical Sciences > Chemistry > Biological Chemistry > Biochemistry