Claiming God’s Land: Spiritual Struggles and Migrant Belonging on Zimbabwe’s Urban Edge

In the edges of Zimbabwean cities, invisible struggles unfold as Malawian migrants claim land they believe belongs to God. My research focused on the moral, spiritual, and communal tactics that transform land into a site of survival, identity, and insurgent belonging. Unite our voices for justice!!
Claiming God’s Land: Spiritual Struggles and Migrant Belonging on Zimbabwe’s Urban Edge
Like

Share this post

Choose a social network to share with, or copy the URL to share elsewhere

This is a representation of how your post may appear on social media. The actual post will vary between social networks

Explore the Research

SpringerLink
SpringerLink SpringerLink

This is God’s land: Moral economies, spirituality, and insurgent land seizures in Zimbabwe’s urban peripheries - Discover Global Society

In the contested urban peripheries of African cities, land is not merely a resource to be owned, it is a moral claim, a spiritual inheritance, and a battleground for survival. As urban expansion collides with histories of displacement and exclusion, marginalized migrants forge insurgent pathways to belonging that defy formal legal frameworks. In some cases, this is because urban and peri-urban farming have become essential survival strategies in Africa’s rapidly expanding cities. However, access to land for urban and peri-urban farming remains a significant hurdle, especially, for marginalized migrants. This paper explores how Malawian migrants at Lydiate informal settlement in peri-urban Zimbabwe mobilize insurgent practices—land seizures, spiritual claims, and communal strategies to access land for farming. Anchored in the insurgent citizenship framework, the study draws on eighteen months of intensive ethnographic fieldwork (2018–2020), including in-depth interviews with 50 migrants across generational cohorts, key informant interviews with local leaders, and extensive participant observation of everyday land negotiations and spiritual performances. The findings reveal that marginalized migrants construct alternative land governance systems based on informal seizures, communal endorsement, and moral-spiritual claims to space. Notably, migrants invoke divine ownership narratives “this is God’s land”, deploy Nyau cult practices, and use witchcraft deterrence as tactical tools for defending seized land. These practices extend insurgent citizenship beyond political-legal rights to encompass moral, communal, and mystical terrains of urban belonging. Policy recommendations advocate for the recognition of informal access systems, the integration of adverse possession frameworks, and participatory planning models sensitive to spirituality and migrant livelihoods. Foregrounding the material, moral, and mystical dimensions of urban struggle, the study calls for a decolonized, pluralistic understanding of African urbanization, one attentive to the layered, lived realities shaping land, citizenship, and survival at the city’s contested edge.

The Story Behind the Research

In 2018, I first set foot in Lydiate, a rough peri-urban settlement west of Harare. I had heard whispers of families clearing abandoned plots at night, not out of defiance alone, but because they truly believed the land was a divine gift. As a Zimbabwean who grew up hearing stories of displacement and colonial labour migration, I felt a deep personal pull to understand how these migrants, many descendants of Malawian workers, wrestle space, dignity, and belonging in a city that often ignores them.

My motivation was twofold. Intellectually, I wanted to expand the concept of insurgent citizenship beyond legal battles into the moral and mystical realms that shape everyday life on the urban fringe. Emotionally, I was driven by the resilience I witnessed: grandmothers tending maize under twilight skies, spirits invoked to guard their plots, and neighbours standing as witnesses when disputes erupted. These moments demanded a narrative that honoured both the material and spiritual dimensions of land struggle.

Listening to Voices from the Margins

Over eighteen months, I sat with fifty Lydiatians across generations, farmers in their seventies, young women sowing seeds by the railway buffers, community leaders navigating local politics. I learned that land is not just soil and crops; it is kinship, ritual, and moral economy. Jemtias, an elder, told me, “This land belongs to God! No one should monopolise what the Creator shared.” Petro, a devout Muslim, reminded me of the universal rights of all creatures under Allah.

These conversations revealed a package of tactics: silent night-time seizures of under-utilised plots; communal endorsements by fictive kin; simultaneous claims on multiple parcels as a hedge against eviction; and even the haunting rhythms of Nyau ritual dancers emerging from nearby graveyards to ward off would-be trespassers. Each practice was a voice saying, “We belong here,” in ways that official titles never could.

Theoretical Lenses and Conceptual Innovations

Traditional urban theory often ties citizenship to formal rights and bureaucratic recognition. What I discovered in Lydiate is a richer, more complex claim-making process. Drawing on Holston’s insurgent citizenship, I argue that land seizures become moral-spatial assertions: migrants are not merely breaking rules, they are reframing land as a divine commons.

Bringing moral economies and spirituality to the foreground, this study extends insurgent citizenship into mystical terrain. Rituals like Nyau performances and the strategic invocation of witchcraft deterrence are not fringe phenomena but central tactics for asserting belonging. They remind us that urban struggles in many African contexts are as much about cosmology and moral order as they are about policy and law.

Challenges in the Field

Ethical dilemmas surfaced daily. I navigated the fine line between documenting occult practices and not sensationalizing them. Some migrants feared retribution if their belief in witchcraft became public. Politically, the settlement existed in a grey zone: local authorities turned a blind eye to farming on buffer zones but cracked down on more visible land grabs.

Emotionally, listening to stories of threat, from Chinese investors fencing lands they used to farm to neighbours wielding spells, was taxing. I had to confront my own scepticism about witchcraft while bearing witness to how deeply these beliefs shaped people’s lives. Ensuring anonymity, gaining trust, and respecting sacred rituals required constant reflection on my role as both observer and confidant.

Key Findings

  1. Self-Allocation as Survival: Migrants clear unused land, roadside strips, commons, abandoned war-veteran farms, to feed their families, believing they have no other options.
  2. Divine Justification: The refrain “This is God’s land” transforms personal necessity into moral entitlement, challenging exclusive property regimes.
  3. Communal Safeguards: Consistent use, multiple claims, and endorsements by neighbours create a network of informal tenure security.
  4. Spiritual Deterrence: Nyau cult processions and witchcraft threats act as powerful deterrents against eviction, no permit needed when fear of the occult stands guard.

These findings show that land access is not just about digging soil; it’s about digging deep into shared beliefs, alliances, and moral claims.

Why It Matters

Urban agriculture is lauded for food security, yet policies rarely account for how vulnerable groups actually get land. Recognising informal access systems, tempered by moral and spiritual dimensions, can guide planners towards more inclusive, flexible governance.

When policymakers see land as more than a commodity, they can legitimise vernacular practices through participatory planning that respects spirituality and migrant livelihoods. This approach strengthens social justice, enhances food resilience, and fosters urban environments where no group is labelled a perpetual outsider.

Reflections and Hopes

I hope readers come away with a new lens: one that sees the spiritual pulse of urban margins, not as a relic, but as a living strategy for survival and dignity. For the general public, this means recognising that permaculture thrives not only through plots and policies but through rituals, communal bonds, and moral energies.

For policymakers, the message is clear: integrate adverse possession frameworks and community-led mapping to formalise what is already working on the ground. For activists and students, let this research be an invitation to listen, truly listen, to unheard voices whose dreams of home and belonging challenge dominant urban scripts.

A Note to Fellow Researchers

Working in politicised, emotionally charged contexts demands humility and reflexivity. Build long-term relationships, respect cosmological beliefs, and engage ethics beyond paperwork: ask who benefits, who is at risk, and how your presence reshapes local power dynamics. Collaborate with community leaders, co-produce knowledge, and be prepared for surprises that defy academic neatness. Above all, carry empathy as your compass.

Please sign in or register for FREE

If you are a registered user on Research Communities by Springer Nature, please sign in

Follow the Topic

Scholars at Risk
Research Communities > Scholars at Risk
Archaeological Methodology
Humanities and Social Sciences > Archaeology > Archaeological Methodology
Anthropology of Religion
Humanities and Social Sciences > Religion > Anthropology of Religion
Support
Research Communities > About the Communities > Support
Cultural Heritage
Humanities and Social Sciences > Cultural Studies > Cultural Heritage
Sustainability
Research Communities > Community > Sustainability

Related Collections

With Collections, you can get published faster and increase your visibility.

Impact of Disruption of Internationalization on Poverty, the Environment, and Income Inequality

In an increasingly interconnected world, the global flow of goods, services, capital, and labor has been a driving force behind economic development and environmental change. However, recent disruptions to internationalization—whether due to geopolitical tensions, trade wars, pandemics, or supply chain shocks—have raised urgent questions about their broader impacts on poverty, the environment, and income inequality. We call for interdisciplinary research that critically examines these dynamics to better understand how disruptions to global interconnectedness influence these crucial aspects.

The disruption of international trade and investment flows can have profound implications for poverty, particularly in developing countries where economies are often reliant on global markets. Research is needed to explore how such disruptions affect employment, income, and access to essential goods and services in vulnerable populations. Research is also needed to understand how countries facing these shocks have coped with them. Understanding the pathways through which these shocks exacerbate or alleviate poverty is vital for crafting effective policy responses.

Environmental impacts are another critical area of concern. The shift towards more localized production and consumption patterns may reduce the carbon footprint associated with global supply chains, but it could also lead to increased environmental degradation in regions where regulations are weaker or production less efficient. Research is required to assess how disruptions in internationalization affect environmental outcomes, particularly in terms of resource extraction, pollution, and biodiversity loss.

Income inequality, both within and between countries, is also likely to be influenced by these disruptions. As global supply chains are altered and trade patterns shift, certain industries and regions may benefit while others suffer, potentially widening existing inequalities. We seek research that investigates the distributional effects of these disruptions, identifying the winners and losers in the global economy and proposing strategies to ensure more equitable outcomes.

This topical collection seeks interdisciplinary research to provide a more comprehensive understanding of these complex problems. The call is open to a wide range of approaches, including theoretical, quantitative, and qualitative methods.

Keywords: Internationalization; Globalization; Poverty Alleviation; Income Inequality; Environment; Sustainability; Development

Publishing Model: Open Access

Deadline: Dec 02, 2025

The Rise of AI: Reshaping Careers and Redefining Workforce Dynamics

Artificial intelligence (AI) has emerged as a revolutionary force in the field of technological advancement, with the potential to transform various aspects of our society. Employment is one sector where AI is predicted to have a significant impact, as it brings with it a variety of opportunities and challenges. According to a World Economic Forum report, automation and artificial intelligence are predicted to displace around 85 million jobs across various industries by 2025, while also creating approximately 97 million new job opportunities. According to a McKinsey Global Institute report, by 2030, up to 375 million people, or approximately 14% of the global workforce, may need to shift jobs due to the deployment of automation and AI. However, widespread AI use is expected to boost the economy. According to a PwC estimate, AI might contribute up to $15.7 trillion to the global economy by 2030, with benefits across many industries.

AI looks to try to automate repetitive and monotonous jobs, improve productivity and decision making, and allow people to focus on higher-value work and creativity. It also provides an opportunity for entrepreneurs and experts to venture into unknown territory, fuelling economic growth and creating job possibilities in cutting-edge industries. Along with opportunities, it may present major challenges. For example, automation due to AI could potentially lead to a displacement of certain job roles, and workers would need to adopt new ways of working and acquire new skill sets to remain in the workplace; however, not all individuals have equal access to educational opportunities or the ability to upskill, potentially leading to disparities and exacerbating socioeconomic inequality. Furthermore, ethical problems around AI have yet to be addressed; it appears that this area will get more challenging as we construct more advanced AI systems.

Without a doubt, the impact of AI on employment is a complex interplay of both positive and negative influences. While AI has the potential to automate ordinary tasks, improve decision-making, and stimulate creativity, it also raises worries about job displacement, skill gaps, and ethical concerns. To effectively navigate this landscape, a detailed investigation of AI and its impact on employment is required, as there is currently a shortage of knowledge in this area. Some of the questions below required immediate response in order to increase our level of understanding and, in some ways, prepare us for the future:

· How can individuals adapt and acquire new skills to remain employable in an AI-driven workforce?

· What are the potential economic implications of AI adoption, including job creation and income inequality?

· What measures can be taken to address potential job displacement and ensure a just and inclusive transition?

· How will AI impact the nature of work, job roles, and the distribution of tasks between humans and machines?

· What ethical considerations arise from the use of AI in employment, such as bias, fairness, and transparency?

· What opportunities does AI present for innovation, entrepreneurship, and the creation of new job roles?

· How can policymakers, educators, and businesses collaborate to prepare the workforce for the AI revolution?

· How can AI be leveraged to enhance productivity, decision-making, and the overall quality of work?

· What are the potential long-term effects of AI on the structure of industries and the overall economy?

· How can AI be effectively utilized to augment human capabilities and enable more fulfilling and meaningful work experiences?

· What are the key considerations for organizations in terms of workforce planning and talent management in an AI-driven era?

· How can AI technologies be harnessed to address societal challenges, such as reducing bias and discrimination in hiring processes?

· What are the implications of AI on job satisfaction, employee well-being, and work-life balance?

· What role does AI play in fostering workplace diversity, inclusion, and equal opportunities for all?

· How can governments and policymakers encourage responsible AI adoption while ensuring protection for workers and their rights?

· What are the potential implications of AI on the gig economy, freelancing, and remote work arrangements?

· How can AI be leveraged to address emerging skills gaps and enable lifelong learning opportunities for workers?

· What are the implications of AI on the future of education and the skills and knowledge required for the workforce of tomorrow?

This list is not exhaustive, but it may serve as a starting point for additional research on this topic. This Collection attempts to answer some of the questions stated above, as well as to study the complicated impact of AI on employment, looking at both its positive and negative elements.

Understanding the implications of social changes brought about by technological innovations is fundamental for societies to prepare for upcoming challenges. Critical reflection and careful analysis can help ensure that the future we are building is a desired and sustainable for all. In this context, the contribution of researchers, public policy analysts, politicians and social movements is important to offer reflective and theoretical-methodological perspectives to anticipate possible consequences of ongoing social changes.

Keywords: Artificial intelligence (AI), AI readiness, desired future, future of societies, future of work, materializing future, sustainability

Publishing Model: Open Access

Deadline: Jul 31, 2026