Claiming God’s Land: Spiritual Struggles and Migrant Belonging on Zimbabwe’s Urban Edge

In the edges of Zimbabwean cities, invisible struggles unfold as Malawian migrants claim land they believe belongs to God. My research focused on the moral, spiritual, and communal tactics that transform land into a site of survival, identity, and insurgent belonging. Unite our voices for justice!!
Claiming God’s Land: Spiritual Struggles and Migrant Belonging on Zimbabwe’s Urban Edge

Share this post

Choose a social network to share with, or copy the URL to share elsewhere

This is a representation of how your post may appear on social media. The actual post will vary between social networks

Explore the Research

SpringerLink
SpringerLink SpringerLink

This is God’s land: Moral economies, spirituality, and insurgent land seizures in Zimbabwe’s urban peripheries - Discover Global Society

In the contested urban peripheries of African cities, land is not merely a resource to be owned, it is a moral claim, a spiritual inheritance, and a battleground for survival. As urban expansion collides with histories of displacement and exclusion, marginalized migrants forge insurgent pathways to belonging that defy formal legal frameworks. In some cases, this is because urban and peri-urban farming have become essential survival strategies in Africa’s rapidly expanding cities. However, access to land for urban and peri-urban farming remains a significant hurdle, especially, for marginalized migrants. This paper explores how Malawian migrants at Lydiate informal settlement in peri-urban Zimbabwe mobilize insurgent practices—land seizures, spiritual claims, and communal strategies to access land for farming. Anchored in the insurgent citizenship framework, the study draws on eighteen months of intensive ethnographic fieldwork (2018–2020), including in-depth interviews with 50 migrants across generational cohorts, key informant interviews with local leaders, and extensive participant observation of everyday land negotiations and spiritual performances. The findings reveal that marginalized migrants construct alternative land governance systems based on informal seizures, communal endorsement, and moral-spiritual claims to space. Notably, migrants invoke divine ownership narratives “this is God’s land”, deploy Nyau cult practices, and use witchcraft deterrence as tactical tools for defending seized land. These practices extend insurgent citizenship beyond political-legal rights to encompass moral, communal, and mystical terrains of urban belonging. Policy recommendations advocate for the recognition of informal access systems, the integration of adverse possession frameworks, and participatory planning models sensitive to spirituality and migrant livelihoods. Foregrounding the material, moral, and mystical dimensions of urban struggle, the study calls for a decolonized, pluralistic understanding of African urbanization, one attentive to the layered, lived realities shaping land, citizenship, and survival at the city’s contested edge.

The Story Behind the Research

In 2018, I first set foot in Lydiate, a rough peri-urban settlement west of Harare. I had heard whispers of families clearing abandoned plots at night, not out of defiance alone, but because they truly believed the land was a divine gift. As a Zimbabwean who grew up hearing stories of displacement and colonial labour migration, I felt a deep personal pull to understand how these migrants, many descendants of Malawian workers, wrestle space, dignity, and belonging in a city that often ignores them.

My motivation was twofold. Intellectually, I wanted to expand the concept of insurgent citizenship beyond legal battles into the moral and mystical realms that shape everyday life on the urban fringe. Emotionally, I was driven by the resilience I witnessed: grandmothers tending maize under twilight skies, spirits invoked to guard their plots, and neighbours standing as witnesses when disputes erupted. These moments demanded a narrative that honoured both the material and spiritual dimensions of land struggle.

Listening to Voices from the Margins

Over eighteen months, I sat with fifty Lydiatians across generations, farmers in their seventies, young women sowing seeds by the railway buffers, community leaders navigating local politics. I learned that land is not just soil and crops; it is kinship, ritual, and moral economy. Jemtias, an elder, told me, “This land belongs to God! No one should monopolise what the Creator shared.” Petro, a devout Muslim, reminded me of the universal rights of all creatures under Allah.

These conversations revealed a package of tactics: silent night-time seizures of under-utilised plots; communal endorsements by fictive kin; simultaneous claims on multiple parcels as a hedge against eviction; and even the haunting rhythms of Nyau ritual dancers emerging from nearby graveyards to ward off would-be trespassers. Each practice was a voice saying, “We belong here,” in ways that official titles never could.

Theoretical Lenses and Conceptual Innovations

Traditional urban theory often ties citizenship to formal rights and bureaucratic recognition. What I discovered in Lydiate is a richer, more complex claim-making process. Drawing on Holston’s insurgent citizenship, I argue that land seizures become moral-spatial assertions: migrants are not merely breaking rules, they are reframing land as a divine commons.

Bringing moral economies and spirituality to the foreground, this study extends insurgent citizenship into mystical terrain. Rituals like Nyau performances and the strategic invocation of witchcraft deterrence are not fringe phenomena but central tactics for asserting belonging. They remind us that urban struggles in many African contexts are as much about cosmology and moral order as they are about policy and law.

Challenges in the Field

Ethical dilemmas surfaced daily. I navigated the fine line between documenting occult practices and not sensationalizing them. Some migrants feared retribution if their belief in witchcraft became public. Politically, the settlement existed in a grey zone: local authorities turned a blind eye to farming on buffer zones but cracked down on more visible land grabs.

Emotionally, listening to stories of threat, from Chinese investors fencing lands they used to farm to neighbours wielding spells, was taxing. I had to confront my own scepticism about witchcraft while bearing witness to how deeply these beliefs shaped people’s lives. Ensuring anonymity, gaining trust, and respecting sacred rituals required constant reflection on my role as both observer and confidant.

Key Findings

  1. Self-Allocation as Survival: Migrants clear unused land, roadside strips, commons, abandoned war-veteran farms, to feed their families, believing they have no other options.
  2. Divine Justification: The refrain “This is God’s land” transforms personal necessity into moral entitlement, challenging exclusive property regimes.
  3. Communal Safeguards: Consistent use, multiple claims, and endorsements by neighbours create a network of informal tenure security.
  4. Spiritual Deterrence: Nyau cult processions and witchcraft threats act as powerful deterrents against eviction, no permit needed when fear of the occult stands guard.

These findings show that land access is not just about digging soil; it’s about digging deep into shared beliefs, alliances, and moral claims.

Why It Matters

Urban agriculture is lauded for food security, yet policies rarely account for how vulnerable groups actually get land. Recognising informal access systems, tempered by moral and spiritual dimensions, can guide planners towards more inclusive, flexible governance.

When policymakers see land as more than a commodity, they can legitimise vernacular practices through participatory planning that respects spirituality and migrant livelihoods. This approach strengthens social justice, enhances food resilience, and fosters urban environments where no group is labelled a perpetual outsider.

Reflections and Hopes

I hope readers come away with a new lens: one that sees the spiritual pulse of urban margins, not as a relic, but as a living strategy for survival and dignity. For the general public, this means recognising that permaculture thrives not only through plots and policies but through rituals, communal bonds, and moral energies.

For policymakers, the message is clear: integrate adverse possession frameworks and community-led mapping to formalise what is already working on the ground. For activists and students, let this research be an invitation to listen, truly listen, to unheard voices whose dreams of home and belonging challenge dominant urban scripts.

A Note to Fellow Researchers

Working in politicised, emotionally charged contexts demands humility and reflexivity. Build long-term relationships, respect cosmological beliefs, and engage ethics beyond paperwork: ask who benefits, who is at risk, and how your presence reshapes local power dynamics. Collaborate with community leaders, co-produce knowledge, and be prepared for surprises that defy academic neatness. Above all, carry empathy as your compass.

Follow the Topic

Scholars at Risk
Research Communities > Scholars at Risk
Archaeological Methodology
Humanities and Social Sciences > Archaeology > Archaeological Methodology
Anthropology of Religion
Humanities and Social Sciences > Religion > Anthropology of Religion
Support
Research Communities > About the Communities > Support
Cultural Heritage
Humanities and Social Sciences > Cultural Studies > Cultural Heritage
Sustainability
Research Communities > Community > Sustainability

What are SDG Topics?

An introduction to Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) Topics and their role in highlighting sustainable development research.

Continue reading announcement

Related Collections

With Collections, you can get published faster and increase your visibility.

Sustainable and Democratic Governance: Intersecting Law, Society, and Digital Ecosystems

The world today stands at a crossroads between rapid technological advancement and the urgent need for sustainable governance. Digitalization is no longer merely an administrative tool, but rather a governmental infrastructure that regulates rights and social behaviour on a global scale. However, this phenomenon is ambivalent: it promises transparency and participation, while simultaneously risking the creation of exclusion, concentration of power, and the fragility of democracy that transcends national borders.

From a global perspective, digital governance can no longer be viewed as a purely domestic issue. Transnational digital architecture has challenged traditional legal sovereignty. As data flows without regard for territorial boundaries, tensions arise between the dominant regulatory models of the Global North and the socio-political realities of the Global South.

There are five main themes to be discussed:

(1). Digital Governance & Democratic Resilience: Focusing on algorithmic accountability and data transparency to safeguard democratic values from the erosion of civic space at the global level;

(2). Legal Boundaries in the Digital Ecosystem: Examining the readiness of legal systems to regulate global platforms and data privacy as a fundamental human right;

(3). Social Equity & the Digital Divide: Critiquing marginalization in the Global South and promoting the empowerment of vulnerable groups through equitable access to technology;

(4). Sustainable Technology & Environmental Governance: Balancing the use of Big Data for global climate mitigation with responsibility for carbon footprints;

(5). Cyber Ethics & Social Resilience: Formulating international strategies against disinformation and polarization through digital literacy grounded in the value of honesty.

Through these interdisciplinary discussions, it is hoped that a global understanding will emerge regarding how law and society can adapt to ensure that the digital ecosystem continues to support the principles of democracy and future sustainability.

Keywords: Digital Governance, Democratic Resilience, Legal Boundaries in the Digital Ecosystem, Sustainable Technology, Environmental Governance, Cyber Ethics, Social Resilience

Publishing Model: Open Access

Deadline: Mar 31, 2027

Agentic Artificial Intelligence, Gender Equity, and Inclusive Digital Futures

This proposed Collection examines how Artificial Intelligence (AI), particularly agentic AI systems capable of autonomous decision-making and adaptive orchestration, can advance gender equity and inclusive development within digital societies. While AI-driven transformation reshapes governance, labor markets, financial systems, and public service delivery, structural gender inequalities risk being encoded and amplified within algorithmic systems.

This Collection seeks interdisciplinary research that critically evaluates both the empowering potential and structural risks of agentic AI, with emphasis on women’s economic participation, algorithmic governance, digital inclusion, and institutional accountability. Contributions are encouraged that explore AI-enabled financial inclusion, gender-responsive digital policy, bias auditing in autonomous systems, women’s participation in digital entrepreneurship, and AI’s role in strengthening social cohesion and public institutions.

The Collection prioritizes empirical research, comparative studies, computational audits, and policy frameworks, particularly from developing and emerging economies, aligned with Sustainable Development Goals. By foregrounding women not only as users but as designers, innovators, and decision-makers within AI ecosystems, this Collection advances structural approaches to equitable digital transformation.

This Collection aims to:

1. Advance rigorous, evidence-based research on AI and gender equity.

2. Develop governance and regulatory frameworks for responsible agentic AI deployment.

3. Highlight empirical cases from developing economies and Global South contexts.

4. Foster cross-disciplinary dialogue among Information Systems, Sociology, Economics, Public Policy, and Gender Studies.

5. Provide actionable policy insights aligned with sustainable digital development strategies.

Submissions using quantitative (SEM, causal modeling), qualitative (case studies, institutional analysis), computational auditing, and mixed-method approaches are particularly encouraged.

Publishing Model: Open Access

Deadline: Dec 18, 2026