Claiming God’s Land: Spiritual Struggles and Migrant Belonging on Zimbabwe’s Urban Edge
Published in Social Sciences, Sustainability, and Arts & Humanities
The Story Behind the Research
In 2018, I first set foot in Lydiate, a rough peri-urban settlement west of Harare. I had heard whispers of families clearing abandoned plots at night, not out of defiance alone, but because they truly believed the land was a divine gift. As a Zimbabwean who grew up hearing stories of displacement and colonial labour migration, I felt a deep personal pull to understand how these migrants, many descendants of Malawian workers, wrestle space, dignity, and belonging in a city that often ignores them.
My motivation was twofold. Intellectually, I wanted to expand the concept of insurgent citizenship beyond legal battles into the moral and mystical realms that shape everyday life on the urban fringe. Emotionally, I was driven by the resilience I witnessed: grandmothers tending maize under twilight skies, spirits invoked to guard their plots, and neighbours standing as witnesses when disputes erupted. These moments demanded a narrative that honoured both the material and spiritual dimensions of land struggle.
Listening to Voices from the Margins
Over eighteen months, I sat with fifty Lydiatians across generations, farmers in their seventies, young women sowing seeds by the railway buffers, community leaders navigating local politics. I learned that land is not just soil and crops; it is kinship, ritual, and moral economy. Jemtias, an elder, told me, “This land belongs to God! No one should monopolise what the Creator shared.” Petro, a devout Muslim, reminded me of the universal rights of all creatures under Allah.
These conversations revealed a package of tactics: silent night-time seizures of under-utilised plots; communal endorsements by fictive kin; simultaneous claims on multiple parcels as a hedge against eviction; and even the haunting rhythms of Nyau ritual dancers emerging from nearby graveyards to ward off would-be trespassers. Each practice was a voice saying, “We belong here,” in ways that official titles never could.
Theoretical Lenses and Conceptual Innovations
Traditional urban theory often ties citizenship to formal rights and bureaucratic recognition. What I discovered in Lydiate is a richer, more complex claim-making process. Drawing on Holston’s insurgent citizenship, I argue that land seizures become moral-spatial assertions: migrants are not merely breaking rules, they are reframing land as a divine commons.
Bringing moral economies and spirituality to the foreground, this study extends insurgent citizenship into mystical terrain. Rituals like Nyau performances and the strategic invocation of witchcraft deterrence are not fringe phenomena but central tactics for asserting belonging. They remind us that urban struggles in many African contexts are as much about cosmology and moral order as they are about policy and law.
Challenges in the Field
Ethical dilemmas surfaced daily. I navigated the fine line between documenting occult practices and not sensationalizing them. Some migrants feared retribution if their belief in witchcraft became public. Politically, the settlement existed in a grey zone: local authorities turned a blind eye to farming on buffer zones but cracked down on more visible land grabs.
Emotionally, listening to stories of threat, from Chinese investors fencing lands they used to farm to neighbours wielding spells, was taxing. I had to confront my own scepticism about witchcraft while bearing witness to how deeply these beliefs shaped people’s lives. Ensuring anonymity, gaining trust, and respecting sacred rituals required constant reflection on my role as both observer and confidant.
Key Findings
- Self-Allocation as Survival: Migrants clear unused land, roadside strips, commons, abandoned war-veteran farms, to feed their families, believing they have no other options.
- Divine Justification: The refrain “This is God’s land” transforms personal necessity into moral entitlement, challenging exclusive property regimes.
- Communal Safeguards: Consistent use, multiple claims, and endorsements by neighbours create a network of informal tenure security.
- Spiritual Deterrence: Nyau cult processions and witchcraft threats act as powerful deterrents against eviction, no permit needed when fear of the occult stands guard.
These findings show that land access is not just about digging soil; it’s about digging deep into shared beliefs, alliances, and moral claims.
Why It Matters
Urban agriculture is lauded for food security, yet policies rarely account for how vulnerable groups actually get land. Recognising informal access systems, tempered by moral and spiritual dimensions, can guide planners towards more inclusive, flexible governance.
When policymakers see land as more than a commodity, they can legitimise vernacular practices through participatory planning that respects spirituality and migrant livelihoods. This approach strengthens social justice, enhances food resilience, and fosters urban environments where no group is labelled a perpetual outsider.
Reflections and Hopes
I hope readers come away with a new lens: one that sees the spiritual pulse of urban margins, not as a relic, but as a living strategy for survival and dignity. For the general public, this means recognising that permaculture thrives not only through plots and policies but through rituals, communal bonds, and moral energies.
For policymakers, the message is clear: integrate adverse possession frameworks and community-led mapping to formalise what is already working on the ground. For activists and students, let this research be an invitation to listen, truly listen, to unheard voices whose dreams of home and belonging challenge dominant urban scripts.
A Note to Fellow Researchers
Working in politicised, emotionally charged contexts demands humility and reflexivity. Build long-term relationships, respect cosmological beliefs, and engage ethics beyond paperwork: ask who benefits, who is at risk, and how your presence reshapes local power dynamics. Collaborate with community leaders, co-produce knowledge, and be prepared for surprises that defy academic neatness. Above all, carry empathy as your compass.
Follow the Topic
-
Discover Global Society
This is an interdisciplinary, international journal that welcomes research on the complexities of modern global society, its development and its challenges.
What are SDG Topics?
An introduction to Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) Topics and their role in highlighting sustainable development research.
Continue reading announcementRelated Collections
With Collections, you can get published faster and increase your visibility.
Technology, Governance and Social Cohesion: Pathways to Sustainable Development
This Collection invites contributions that examine the dynamic intersections among technology, digital transformation, governance, social cohesion, and sustainable development in an increasingly interconnected world. Innovations and Technological progression in areas like artificial intelligence (AI), big data analytics, business intelligence, financial technology, and e-governance is reshaping institutions, economies, and social relations. These innovations present transformative opportunities for transparency, participation, and inclusion, yet they also risk intensifying existing inequalities within and across societies.
This Collection seeks original and interdisciplinary research that critically explores how emerging digital technologies influence organizational and governance structures, policy design, and pathways toward equitable social and sustainable development. Contributors are encouraged to investigate both the promises and perils of digital innovation, addressing issues such as:
a) The role of technology in augmenting workflow process, strengthening transparency, accountability, and citizen participation and engagement
b) Digital democracy and bridging the digital divide, implications for equality of opportunity
c) Ethical, legal, and regulatory challenges posed by emerging technologies such as generative artificial intelligence and automation
d) The impact of digital economies on labor, employment, and inequality
e) The potential of digital innovation to advance the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), particularly SDG 1 (No Poverty), SDG 5 (Gender Equality), and SDG 16 (Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions).
f) Case studies on the role of digital society and digital citizenship in service delivery co-creation.
By integrating perspectives from Information systems, sociology, political science, economics, technology studies, and development policy, this Collection aims to foster cross-disciplinary dialogue on how societies can harness digital transformation to build inclusive, equitable, and resilient futures. Submissions are welcome from scholars and practitioners working across diverse regional and thematic contexts. Empirical cases from developing economies are strongly recommended.
Keywords: Digital Transformation, Digital Society, Inequality, Artificial Intelligence, Sustainable Development, Digital Divide, Social Policy, E-Governance, Global Society, Sustainable Development Goals, Social Cohesion
Publishing Model: Open Access
Deadline: Jan 31, 2027
Agentic Artificial Intelligence, Gender Equity, and Inclusive Digital Futures
This proposed Collection examines how Artificial Intelligence (AI), particularly agentic AI systems capable of autonomous decision-making and adaptive orchestration, can advance gender equity and inclusive development within digital societies. While AI-driven transformation reshapes governance, labor markets, financial systems, and public service delivery, structural gender inequalities risk being encoded and amplified within algorithmic systems.
This Collection seeks interdisciplinary research that critically evaluates both the empowering potential and structural risks of agentic AI, with emphasis on women’s economic participation, algorithmic governance, digital inclusion, and institutional accountability. Contributions are encouraged that explore AI-enabled financial inclusion, gender-responsive digital policy, bias auditing in autonomous systems, women’s participation in digital entrepreneurship, and AI’s role in strengthening social cohesion and public institutions.
The Collection prioritizes empirical research, comparative studies, computational audits, and policy frameworks, particularly from developing and emerging economies, aligned with Sustainable Development Goals. By foregrounding women not only as users but as designers, innovators, and decision-makers within AI ecosystems, this Collection advances structural approaches to equitable digital transformation.
This Collection aims to:
1. Advance rigorous, evidence-based research on AI and gender equity.
2. Develop governance and regulatory frameworks for responsible agentic AI deployment.
3. Highlight empirical cases from developing economies and Global South contexts.
4. Foster cross-disciplinary dialogue among Information Systems, Sociology, Economics, Public Policy, and Gender Studies.
5. Provide actionable policy insights aligned with sustainable digital development strategies.
Submissions using quantitative (SEM, causal modeling), qualitative (case studies, institutional analysis), computational auditing, and mixed-method approaches are particularly encouraged.
Publishing Model: Open Access
Deadline: Dec 18, 2026
Please sign in or register for FREE
If you are a registered user on Research Communities by Springer Nature, please sign in