Shining a Light on Indian Orthopaedics: A Look at the Research That's Changing the World

Our recent study, published in the Indian Journal of Orthopaedics (IJO), takes a deep dive into this very idea.

Published in Surgery

Like

Share this post

Choose a social network to share with, or copy the URL to share elsewhere

This is a representation of how your post may appear on social media. The actual post will vary between social networks

Explore the Research

SpringerLink
SpringerLink SpringerLink

Bibliometric Analysis of Highly-Cited Papers of Indian Journal of Orthopaedics - Indian Journal of Orthopaedics

Background and Aims This study performed a comprehensive bibliometric analysis comparing Indian and international highly-cited papers (HCPs) in the Indian Journal of Orthopaedics (IJO). Methods The study used a bibliometric design to analyze HCPs published in the IJO between 2007 and 2024, a period selected based on the journal’s Scopus coverage. The Scopus database was used for its comprehensive coverage and robust citation analysis capabilities. All documents published in the IJO during this period were retrieved on June 20, 2025. The threshold for an HCP was set at 51 or more citations, as this indicates significant peer recognition and influence within the academic community. For each HCP, the following data was extracted: the title, publication year, and citation count; the country of origin (Indian or foreign); the study type (original article, review, conference paper, editorial, or letter); the subject focus (e.g., trauma, joint disorders, or infection); author and institutional affiliations; and collaboration patterns, defined as single-institution, national collaboration (two or more institutions within India), or international collaboration (institutions from different countries). Results The 54 HCPs accumulated 4697 citations, averaging 86.98 per paper. Indian HCPs, averaging 89.61 citations, predominantly comprised original articles and reviews focusing on trauma, joint disorders, and infection. Notably, 74% of Indian HCPs were single-institution studies, with limited international collaboration. In contrast, foreign HCPs, averaging 92.46 citations, exhibited a broader range of topics and more frequent national and international collaborations. Until 2011, Indian publications had a statistically significant lower mean difference in CPP (14.4 ± 2.0) compared to foreign publications (19.4 ± 3.9) with a p-value of 0.042; however, after 2011, this disparity vanished, with both Indian and foreign publications showing an 8.1 mean difference (± 4.2 and ± 4.4 respectively) and a p-value of 0.999. Conclusions Indian HCPs focus on localized clinical priorities and have lower collaboration rates than their international counterparts. To enhance the global impact and citation potential of Indian orthopaedic research, expanding national and international collaborations and diversifying research topics is crucial. Graphical Abstract

Have you ever wondered what makes a piece of scientific research stand out? In the world of academia, a paper's influence is often measured by how many times other researchers cite it. It's like a vote of confidence from your peers—the more votes, the more impact your work is having.

We conducted a bibliometric analysis, a fancy term for a data-driven study of publications, to understand the trends and patterns in highly-cited papers. Think of it as a comprehensive report card for the research coming out of India over nearly two decades.


Unpacking the Study: A Look Behind the Scenes

For this project, we looked at the most influential papers published in the IJO between 2007 and 2024. Why those dates? Because that’s when the journal was covered by Scopus, a major academic database. We defined a "highly-cited paper" (HCP) as one that received 51 or more citations, a significant number that shows its importance and influence within the academic community.

We meticulously combed through the data, looking at everything from the topics covered in the papers to the number of authors and the countries they came from. Our goal was to compare the work of Indian authors with that of their international counterparts, looking for similarities, differences, and, most importantly, key trends.


The Findings: A Story of Growth and Local Focus

The results of our analysis told a fascinating story. On one hand, we found that Indian authors are increasingly publishing significant research. However, we also noticed that these papers tend to focus on subjects that are more relevant to India's unique clinical needs. For example, a paper might delve into a specific type of injury or disease prevalent in the country. This local focus is a double-edged sword: it addresses important domestic issues but can sometimes limit the paper's appeal to a broader, global audience.

We also observed a notable difference in collaboration. Indian papers were more likely to be written by authors from a single institution, while international papers often featured collaborations across multiple institutions and even different countries. This highlights a need to foster more teamwork and cross-border partnerships in the Indian research community.


A Positive Shift: Bridging the Citation Gap

But here's the most exciting news from our study: a major positive trend is underway. We discovered that the significant difference in citations between Indian and foreign publications, which was very clear before 2011, has since disappeared. The citation performance has leveled out, which means Indian orthopaedic research is now getting the recognition it deserves on the global stage.

This is a monumental achievement and speaks to the increasing quality and visibility of research coming out of India. It shows that as the quality of the research has improved, so too has its influence. This is a testament to the hard work of countless researchers and the growing prestige of the Indian Journal of Orthopaedics.


The Path Forward: What This Means for the Future

So, where do we go from here? Our findings offer a clear roadmap. To continue elevating the global standing of Indian orthopaedic research, it is crucial to encourage more international collaboration. When researchers from different countries and institutions work together, they bring diverse perspectives, resources, and networks that can increase the reach and impact of their work.

Additionally, diversifying research topics beyond localized issues can help attract a wider readership and more citations. By tackling universal problems and engaging with a global conversation, Indian researchers can ensure their findings are relevant to doctors and scientists around the world.

In conclusion, our study confirms what many have long suspected: Indian orthopaedic research is on the rise. While there is still room to grow, particularly in fostering collaboration and broadening research topics, the progress made over the last decade is undeniable. We are optimistic that by building on this momentum, the Indian research community will continue to make significant contributions to global orthopaedic science for years to come.

Please sign in or register for FREE

If you are a registered user on Research Communities by Springer Nature, please sign in