Unravelling the long-term river health status of Kruger National Park Rivers using macroinvertebrate-based monitoring
Freshwater ecosystems face severe threats from pollution, habitat loss, and climate change. This study analyzes a decade of biomonitoring data (2010–2019) from Kruger National Park’s four rivers using SASS5, habitat, and physicochemical metrics to assess resilience against upstream human pressures.
Published in Earth & Environment, Ecology & Evolution, and Zoology & Veterinary Science
Like
Be the first to like this
-
Study Area: Four rivers (Crocodile, Sabie, Olifants, Luvuvhu) flowing west–east across KNP into Mozambique.
-
Methods: Annual sampling (2010–2019) using SASS5 protocol, habitat surveys, and water quality (pH, EC, flow). Macroinvertebrates identified to family level. Data analyzed via ANOVA and mixed-effects models; Present Ecological Status (PES) classification applied.
Key Findings:
- Rivers differed in health: Olifants and Crocodile consistently degraded (classes D–E), while Sabie and Luvuvhu showed better conditions (classes A–C).
- Macroinvertebrate indices (SASS scores, ASPT) showed strong spatial variation and temporal sensitivity to droughts, floods, and pollution events.
- Environmental variables, especially electrical conductivity (EC), significantly influenced SASS metrics.
- Evidence of recovery potential was observed, with some rivers improving downstream within the park, suggesting a refugium effect.
Discussion:
- Sabie and Luvuvhu rivers displayed resilience and periodic ecological recovery, highlighting the potential role of protected areas in mitigating upstream impacts.
- Crocodile and Olifants rivers remain heavily modified due to persistent anthropogenic pressures upstream.
- Long-term monitoring demonstrated that macroinvertebrate communities respond quickly to disturbances and recovery events.
Conclusion:
- KNP rivers exhibit contrasting ecological conditions, shaped by both natural variability and human pressures.
- Effective management requires upstream interventions, buffer zones, and potentially freshwater protected areas (FPAs).
- Sustained biomonitoring is critical for adaptive conservation planning and safeguarding aquatic biodiversity.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-025-14343-5
Follow the Topic
Zoology
Life Sciences > Biological Sciences > Zoology
Ecology
Life Sciences > Biological Sciences > Ecology
Environmental Sciences
Physical Sciences > Earth and Environmental Sciences > Environmental Sciences
Freshwater and Marine Ecology
Life Sciences > Biological Sciences > Ecology > Freshwater and Marine Ecology
Environmental Monitoring
Physical Sciences > Earth and Environmental Sciences > Environmental Sciences > Environmental Monitoring
-
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment
This is a journal that explores the design and implementation of monitoring systems and pollution risk assessment methods.
Please sign in or register for FREE
If you are a registered user on Research Communities by Springer Nature, please sign in