Unravelling the long-term river health status of Kruger National Park Rivers using macroinvertebrate-based monitoring

Freshwater ecosystems face severe threats from pollution, habitat loss, and climate change. This study analyzes a decade of biomonitoring data (2010–2019) from Kruger National Park’s four rivers using SASS5, habitat, and physicochemical metrics to assess resilience against upstream human pressures.
Like

Share this post

Choose a social network to share with, or copy the URL to share elsewhere

This is a representation of how your post may appear on social media. The actual post will vary between social networks

Explore the Research

SpringerLink
SpringerLink SpringerLink

Unravelling the long-term river health status of Kruger National Park Rivers using macroinvertebrate-based monitoring - Environmental Monitoring and Assessment

The burgeoning population growth and landscape developments over the last decades have had a profound effect on natural resources including riverine water quality and quantity. This resulted in increased pollution events, loss of aquatic biodiversity and the introduction of alien invasive species, which cumulatively have transformed freshwater ecosystem structure, processes and functions. Macroinvertebrate-based biomonitoring, like the South African Scoring System version 5 (SASS5), is a fast and effective way to assess water and habitat quality. However, studies reporting long-term biomonitoring are rare in many Global South systems. Also, river health within protected areas is generally regarded better than those outside, with the park potentially offering refugium and ideal conditions for rivers to recover. However, Kruger National Park (KNP) rivers get impacted by mining and domestic sewage upstream, before entering the park, and it is not clear how much remediation happens as the rivers flows downstream within the park. The current study was initiated to investigate the long-term river health status of four major river systems flowing across the iconic KNP, using SASS5 biomonitoring and selected physico-chemical parameters. Our results showed that SASS5 indices showed difference in their sensitive to anthropogenic impacts, both in space and time. Long-term dataset revealed that the ability of the rivers to recover from poor to good quality (and vice versa) was quite rapid, and also some rivers were progressively declining (e.g. Olifants and Crocodile rivers) while others were improving (e.g. Luvuvhu and Sabie rivers). Consequently, SASS5 appeared to be a useful tool in assessing the long-term health of KNP rivers, providing valuable insights into the overall ecological conditions and water quality of these important aquatic ecosystems that will assist in the park water resource management strategies. Further, our results demonstrated high sensitivity and quick response of macroinvertebrates to disturbance, and an improvement potential as the rivers transversed the park.

  • Study Area: Four rivers (Crocodile, Sabie, Olifants, Luvuvhu) flowing west–east across KNP into Mozambique.

  • Methods: Annual sampling (2010–2019) using SASS5 protocol, habitat surveys, and water quality (pH, EC, flow). Macroinvertebrates identified to family level. Data analyzed via ANOVA and mixed-effects models; Present Ecological Status (PES) classification applied.

 

Key Findings:

  • Rivers differed in health: Olifants and Crocodile consistently degraded (classes D–E), while Sabie and Luvuvhu showed better conditions (classes A–C).
  • Macroinvertebrate indices (SASS scores, ASPT) showed strong spatial variation and temporal sensitivity to droughts, floods, and pollution events.
  • Environmental variables, especially electrical conductivity (EC), significantly influenced SASS metrics.
  • Evidence of recovery potential was observed, with some rivers improving downstream within the park, suggesting a refugium effect.

Discussion:

  • Sabie and Luvuvhu rivers displayed resilience and periodic ecological recovery, highlighting the potential role of protected areas in mitigating upstream impacts.
  • Crocodile and Olifants rivers remain heavily modified due to persistent anthropogenic pressures upstream.
  • Long-term monitoring demonstrated that macroinvertebrate communities respond quickly to disturbances and recovery events.

Conclusion:

  • KNP rivers exhibit contrasting ecological conditions, shaped by both natural variability and human pressures.
  • Effective management requires upstream interventions, buffer zones, and potentially freshwater protected areas (FPAs).
  • Sustained biomonitoring is critical for adaptive conservation planning and safeguarding aquatic biodiversity.


    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-025-14343-5

Please sign in or register for FREE

If you are a registered user on Research Communities by Springer Nature, please sign in

Follow the Topic

Zoology
Life Sciences > Biological Sciences > Zoology
Ecology
Life Sciences > Biological Sciences > Ecology
Environmental Sciences
Physical Sciences > Earth and Environmental Sciences > Environmental Sciences
Freshwater and Marine Ecology
Life Sciences > Biological Sciences > Ecology > Freshwater and Marine Ecology
Environmental Monitoring
Physical Sciences > Earth and Environmental Sciences > Environmental Sciences > Environmental Monitoring