When drought turns urban green into urban inequality

Across 245 major U.S. cities, we found that drought and compound climate extremes do not affect urban vegetation equally. Marginalized communities often experience more severe vegetation degradation during drought, which can further increase heat exposure and deepen existing inequalities.
Like

Share this post

Choose a social network to share with, or copy the URL to share elsewhere

This is a representation of how your post may appear on social media. The actual post will vary between social networks

Across U.S. cities, climate extremes do not affect everyone equally. In two recent studies covering 245 major cities, we show that drought and compound climate extremes can deepen urban vegetation inequality, intensify heat exposure, and disproportionately burden already marginalized communities. These findings suggest that urban greening under climate change is not only an ecological issue, but also a question of environmental justice.

Urban vegetation is often discussed as a solution to climate risk. Trees, parks, and neighborhood green spaces can cool cities, improve environmental quality, and support human well-being. But a central question remains: when drought and extreme climate events occur, do all communities retain these benefits equally? Our recent work suggests the answer is no.

In the first study, published in npj Urban Sustainability, we examined drought-related disparities in urban vegetation degradation and associated heat exposure across major U.S. cities. Using satellite observations and census data, we found that marginalized communities tend to experience more severe vegetation degradation during drought periods. This pattern is especially pronounced in Sunbelt cities, including Southern California and Texas. We also found that unequal vegetation loss during drought can further worsen pre-existing inequalities in heat exposure. In other words, drought does not simply reduce urban greenness overall; it can also redistribute thermal risk in unequal ways.

UVD was measured by ΔNDVI Z-score between the drought and non-drought periods. Each sample represents the difference in ΔNDVI Z-scores between two majority sociodemographic groups within a city (the ΔNDVI Z-scores of first group minus second group): a Non-Hispanic White Population (▵) and People of Color Population (○); b Income of Above 2×Poverty (▵) and Below Poverty (○); c High Education (▵) and Low Education (○); d High Median Age (▵) and Low Median Age (○). The majority groups are designated by the threshold of 75th percentiles for respective sociodemographic variables at the census tract levels. A red triangle indicates that the first group had higher ΔNDVI Z-scores (i.e., less UVD) than the second group, whereas a blue circle indicates the opposite. For example, a red triangle in (a) means that in that city, Non-Hispanic White tracts experienced less vegetation degradation during drought than POC tracts. Symbols with black outlines indicate statistically significant differences (p < 0.05). The tables below each subplot indicate the proportion of cities in each category by climate zone. Notably, UVD was measured using the ΔNDVI Z-score. Because ΔNDVI Z-scores are generally negative (reflecting vegetation degradation during drought), a higher ΔNDVI Z-score indicates less vegetation degradation.

The spatial patterns of urban vegetation degradation (UVD) in drought across different sociodemographic groups.

In the second study, published in npj Environmental Social Sciences, we looked beyond drought episodes to ask a broader question: how do climate extremes shape urban vegetation inequality over time? To address this, we developed a Vegetation Polarization Index (VPI), based on the contrast between the most and least vegetated parts of a city, and applied it to 245 major U.S. cities from 2001 to 2020. The results reveal a striking divergence. Sunbelt cities are more likely to see worsening vegetation inequality under drought and warmer conditions, while northern cities respond differently, with colder and wetter conditions in some cases linked to greater inequality. Particularly concerning is that hot droughts amplify vegetation inequality across almost all cities.

Mean (a) and trends (b) of UVI as represented by VPI for the 245 largest U.S. cities and the respective quartile statistics (c, d) among the four climate zones from 2001 to 2020. Dots outlined in black circles depict statistically significant trends (p < 0.05). The red dashed lines indicate the mean values of all 245 cities in the VPI and the trends of VPI Z-scores. The updated Köppen-Geiger map is used to categorize urbanized areas into four basic climate zones: arid (the western US), snow (the northeastern US), temperate (the southeastern US), and tropic (only in southern Florida) zones. Number of cities in the different climate zones: Arid = 34, Temperate = 122, Tropic = 3, Snow = 86.
The long-term average and trends in UVI (urban vegetation inequality)

Taken together, these two studies point to a consistent message: climate change does not act on urban nature in a socially neutral way. Instead, climate extremes can interact with existing social and spatial inequalities, making some neighborhoods lose vegetation faster and face greater heat stress than others. This matters because urban vegetation is not just a visual amenity. It is part of the infrastructure that helps buffer cities against heat, and unequal access to that protection can translate directly into unequal exposure to environmental risk.

More broadly, this line of research reflects a growing need to connect urban climate science with environmental justice. For many cities, the key question is no longer simply whether to add more green space, but how to ensure that urban vegetation remains resilient under drought, and how its cooling and ecological benefits can be more equitably distributed. As heatwaves, droughts, and compound extremes become more frequent in a warming world, understanding who loses urban green first — and who bears the consequences — will be increasingly important for both science and policy.

These studies also highlight the value of integrating satellite remote sensing, climate indicators, and socioeconomic data to better understand how climate extremes reshape urban ecosystems. By linking vegetation dynamics to heat exposure and social vulnerability, we hope to contribute to a more complete picture of climate risk in cities — one that recognizes that resilience is not only about ecosystems, but also about equity.

Related papers:
Yan, Y., Dong, C. et al. Disparities in urban vegetation degradation and heat exposure during drought periods in U.S. cities. npj Urban Sustainability (published online 15 December 2025; volume 6, article 14 in 2026). https://www.nature.com/articles/s42949-025-00319-4

Yan, Y., Dong, C. et al. Divergent urban vegetation inequality in Northern and Sunbelt United States cities under climate extreme events. npj Environmental Social Sciences (published 8 April 2026; volume 1, article 2). https://www.nature.com/articles/s44432-025-00001-1

Please sign in or register for FREE

If you are a registered user on Research Communities by Springer Nature, please sign in