Why Diversity, Equity and Inclusion are of utmost importance for the field of Community Genetics/Public Health Genomics
Published in Sustainability, Genetics & Genomics, and Public Health
Explore the Research
Achieving the vision of genomics to improve health for all requires a focus on diversity, equity and inclusion - Journal of Community Genetics
Journal of Community Genetics -
In December 2025, the JOCG in collaboration with the journal PHG organized a webinar with the purpose of highlighting an urgent topic: the critical role of diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) in shaping modern genetic and genomic research, clinical implementation, and public health practice.
The Editor-in-Chief (EiC) of JOCG, Prof. Martina Cornel opened the session explaining the journal’s mission to the UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and introduced DEI as a core priority for the journal, scientific community and global health systems.
Then she handed over to the first invited speaker, Prof. Muin Khoury who outlined how inequities arise at every stage of the genomic translation process:
- Underrepresentation of non-European ancestries leads to misinterpretation of genetic variants
- Populations presenting high frequencies of variants of unknown significance consequence of having reference databases that lack comparable data
- Polygenic risk scores and gene–disease associations that often do not transfer across populations
To improve the current situation, Prof Khoury suggested to replace broad population labels with a mix of genetic markers and environmental data; to develop metrics to monitor equity in genomic research, and expand genomic infrastructures in LMICs supported by WHO recommendations.
Our second invited speaker was the EiC of the journal Public Health Genomics, Prof. Colleen McBride. She argued that without proactive engagement of underrepresented communities, genomic research will continue to reflect the biases of its participant base. Current initiatives reported only 33% of public involvement and most efforts remain low intensity.
She also presented a case study conducted in African-American communities to evaluate the prevalence of certain genetic markers in Breast and Ovarian cancer. Her team engaged community members into informative sessions about BRCA genetics and ancestry and enabled discussions on ethically sensitive policy decisions. This led to an increase in knowledge and willingness to participate in studies.
Finally, Dr. Dafne Horovitz, guest editor of the Special Issue Community Genetics in Brazil, summarized the current challenges in Brazil and the efforts to overcome them. Brazil presents one of the world's most complex patterns of genomic mixtures. However, because nearly half of the variants identified are absent from important datasets like 1000 Genomes reference, the genetic findings and therapies developed elsewhere do not reliably translate to the Brazilian population. In 2014 a National Policy for Rare diseases was implemented including 37 accredited centers that offer 95% newborn screening coverage. Additionally, some parts of the country offer access to advanced therapies, and genetic counseling has been integrated into formal care.
In summary, the webinar presented an unified commitment across researchers and practitioners to incorporate more DEI approaches emphasizing that genomics cannot fulfill its promise of improving health for all unless DEI is treated as a scientific, ethical, and operational imperative.
If you want to watch the webinar, you can find it here.
Follow the Topic
Related Collections
With Collections, you can get published faster and increase your visibility.
Global accessibility and applicability of polygenic scores
Publishing Model: Hybrid
Deadline: Ongoing
Stigma in genetics
Genetic and genomic testing may have potentially stigmatising and discriminatory effects on individuals, families, and future generations. It also raises questions related to how families respond to genetic information when a condition that is perceived as potentially stigmatising is found. Additionally, there is a potential impact on communities that extends beyond the level of the family.
Stigma was first defined by Goffman in 1963 as an attribute that is perceived as undesirable and leads to discrimination and a lack of social acceptance of the individual by a community or culture. Since then, models of stigmatisation have expanded to incorporate specific disease contexts, most notably HIV/AIDS and mental illness. However, the concept of stigma remains applicable to inherited conditions.
Stigmatisation and discrimination related to inherited conditions and genetic testing and screening have long been discussed and documented in several studies. However, these papers are published across several different journals and span various disciplinary areas, which are not necessarily accessible to the community genetics readership. As a result, it is challenging to obtain a fuller picture of stigma in genetics.
Therefore, this call for papers for a Special Issue addressing “Stigma in genetics” invites contributions that address various perspectives on stigma in the context of inherited conditions from across the fields of medicine, genetic counselling, bioethics, sociology, anthropology, and psychology. We welcome conceptual analysis, reviews, original research, case studies, commentaries, short communications, or policy and practice reviews. Themes of interest include, but are not restricted, to the following:
• The personal experiences of patients and their families in social interactions
• The lived experience of individuals impacted by stigma due to inherited disorders
• Responses to visible physical or behavioural difference and disability
• Cultural understandings and manifestations of stigmatisation
• Structural or institutional discrimination
• The role of genetic counselling in addressing issues of stigma
• The role of language in the enactment and perpetuation of stigma
• The social, ethical, legal, and personal implications of stigma and discrimination, and the relationship between stigma and discrimination
• The (re)shaping of, and the resistance to, patterns of stigma through forms of advocacy, community mobilisation, participation, and citizenship
Publishing Model: Hybrid
Deadline: Jun 30, 2026
Please sign in or register for FREE
If you are a registered user on Research Communities by Springer Nature, please sign in