Longitudinal liquid biopsy predicts clinical benefit from immunotherapy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer

High heterogeneity in clinical benefit characterizes the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We integrated clinical variables and next generation sequencing data from longitudinal liquid biopsy to build a model able to predict response to immunotherapy.
Longitudinal liquid biopsy predicts clinical benefit from immunotherapy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer
Like

Share this post

Choose a social network to share with, or copy the URL to share elsewhere

This is a representation of how your post may appear on social media. The actual post will vary between social networks

Our recent study published in npj Precision Oncology examined the use of longitudinal liquid biopsies to predict clinical outcomes in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) undergoing immunotherapy. 

We conducted a prospective study involving 113 advanced NSCLC patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). We performed liquid biopsies at three time points:

  • T1: At the start of ICI treatment
  • T2: After three weeks
  • T3: At the time of radiological evaluation

The study focused on several molecular variables:

  • cfDNA quantification: Measuring the amount of circulating free DNA
  • ΔT2-T1 cfDNA: The change in cfDNA levels between T1 and T2
  • maxVAF: The variant allele frequency of the gene with the highest frequency detected at baseline using next-generation sequencing
  • ΔT2-T1 maxVAF: The change in maxVAF between T1 and T2 

Key findings include:

  • Progression-Free Survival (PFS): Shorter PFS was significantly associated with PD-L1 negativity, higher cfDNA levels at T1, an increase in cfDNA between T1 and T2, and higher maxVAF at T2.
  • Overall Survival (OS): Factors linked to shorter OS included PD-L1 negativity, squamous histology, elevated cfDNA at T1, an increase in cfDNA between T1 and T2, and higher maxVAF at T2.

The study developed a composite prognostic model combining molecular biomarkers (e.g., cfDNA levels, changes in maxVAF) with clinical factors such as PD-L1 expression and tumor histology. This integrated model demonstrated superior predictive accuracy for progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) compared to molecular or clinical metrics alone.

A Kaplan–Meier curve for PFS of the study population stratified into three risk groups based on their individual score in the nomogram (Supplementary Figs. 1 and 2). Factors affecting PFS in multiple regression models were: cfDNA concentration in plasma at baseline, maxVAF at T2, increase (∆T2–T1) of cfDNA, and PD-L1 expression. B Kaplan–Meier curves for the OS of the study population stratified into three risk groups based on their individual score in the nomogram (Supplementary Figs. 1 and 2). Factors affecting OS in multiple regression models were: cfDNA at baseline, increased (∆T2–T1) of cfDNA, maxVAF at T2, histology and PD-L1 expression.
A Kaplan–Meier curve for PFS of the study population stratified into three risk groups based on their individual score in the nomogram. Factors affecting PFS in multiple regression models were: cfDNA concentration in plasma at baseline, maxVAF at T2, increase (∆T2–T1) of cfDNA, and PD-L1 expression. B Kaplan–Meier curves for the OS of the study population stratified into three risk groups based on their individual score in the nomogram. Factors affecting OS in multiple regression models were: cfDNA at baseline, increased (∆T2–T1) of cfDNA, maxVAF at T2, histology and PD-L1 expression.

The integrated approach enables better risk stratification and personalized treatment planning for NSCLC patients undergoing immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy.
This study highlights the potential of combining liquid biopsy metrics with clinical data to refine prognostic tools for immunotherapy response.

Please sign in or register for FREE

If you are a registered user on Research Communities by Springer Nature, please sign in

Follow the Topic

Biomarkers
Life Sciences > Health Sciences > Biomedical Research > Biomarkers
Biomarkers
Life Sciences > Health Sciences > Clinical Medicine > Diagnosis > Biomarkers
Tumour Biomarkers
Life Sciences > Biological Sciences > Cancer Biology > Tumour Biomarkers
Cancer Genetics and Genomics
Life Sciences > Biological Sciences > Cancer Biology > Cancer Genetics and Genomics
Translational Research
Life Sciences > Health Sciences > Biomedical Research > Translational Research
Non-small-cell Lung Cancer
Life Sciences > Health Sciences > Clinical Medicine > Diseases > Cancers > Lung Cancer > Non-small-cell Lung Cancer

Related Collections

With collections, you can get published faster and increase your visibility.

Noninvasive biomarkers: bridging real-world evidence and clinical trial data

This collection seeks to advance the discussion on noninvasive biomarkers by exploring their applications and implications across different data landscapes, namely real-world data (RWD) and clinical trial data.

Publishing Model: Open Access

Deadline: Sep 13, 2025

Antibody-drug conjugates for solid tumors

Antibody drug conjugates (ADCs) have revolutionized the field of oncology with more than 100 ADCs in clinical development for different solid tumors. In this series, we will comprehensively review the clinical development of ADCs in different solid tumors, and how ADCs are replacing traditional chemotherapy in oncology.

Publishing Model: Open Access

Deadline: Jul 15, 2025