Understanding Australia’s Infectious Disease Trends Amid COVID-19: A Decade of Insights
Published in Microbiology and Public Health
Infectious diseases are constantly evolving, and understanding their trends is crucial to keeping communities healthy. Our study examines how notifiable diseases in Australia changed over the last decade, including during the COVID-19 pandemic. This study, which analysed data from the National Notifiable Disease Surveillance System from 2012 to 2022, sheds light on patterns of various diseases and the impact of the pandemic's public health measures.
Our study found that prior to COVID-19, notifications for many infectious diseases were on the rise, especially respiratory and gastrointestinal infections. In contrast, diseases transmitted through blood or by vectors, such as viral hepatitis and vector-borne illnesses, showed a slight decline. We found an annual average increase of about 11% for all disease notifications from 2012 to 2019, with respiratory diseases leading this surge. These findings indicate shifts in healthcare engagement and public health policies, diagnostic technology, and possibly changing lifestyles.
With the onset of COVID-19 in 2020, Australia implemented some of the world's most stringent public health measures, including lockdowns, international travel restrictions, and social distancing mandates. The effects on other diseases were profound. Respiratory infections, such as the flu, dropped significantly due to reduced social interactions, masking, and sanitation protocols. However, by 2022, as restrictions eased, these infections rebounded significantly.
Interestingly, while COVID-19 measures decreased respiratory infections and imported diseases, we noted that some infections continued to rise, such as certain gastrointestinal diseases and STIs. This suggests that while some infections are closely tied to social behaviour and public movement, others are less influenced by these factors or might be indirectly affected by changes in healthcare access and behaviours during lockdowns.
Using pre-pandemic trends, we also estimated that over 200,000 cases of various infections were likely averted during the pandemic. We estimated that 65,000 fewer gastrointestinal infections and 121,000 fewer sexually transmitted infections were notified. These “averted cases” provide valuable insights, showing the influence of public health measures on infectious disease dynamics. While the declines in respiratory and imported infections were expected due to restricted travel and physical interactions, the reduction in other diseases highlights how closely healthcare access and behaviours are intertwined with transmission.
Why These Findings Matter
The study’s insights are significant for several reasons:
-
Public Health Preparedness: Knowing how diseases respond to interventions helps us prepare for future pandemics. Public health policies can be adapted to mitigate the risks of other infections when similar measures are necessary.
-
Healthcare Planning: These trends inform healthcare resource allocation and support the development of targeted vaccination, diagnostic, and treatment programs.
This study provides a foundation for ongoing research. Future surveillance is essential to monitor whether these trends persist or shift again as communities adjust to a post-pandemic world. By understanding these trends, public health officials, researchers, and policymakers can make informed decisions that protect communities and create resilient health systems.
Follow the Topic
-
BMC Global and Public Health
An open access, transparent peer review journal publishing outstanding and influential research and opinion of broad interest to all professional communities involved in global and public health research, policy-making, implementation and delivery worldwide.
Related Collections
With Collections, you can get published faster and increase your visibility.
Infectious disease modeling: Impact on public health practices
BMC Global and Public Health is calling for submissions to our Collection on innovative approaches that advance our understanding of health issues impacting communities worldwide. This Collection will serve as a forum for sharing research that improves our ability to respond to critical challenges in disease control and prevention, fostering resilience in health systems and enhancing public health preparedness.
The aim of this Collection is to explore the dynamic field of infectious disease research and the critical insights it provides for effective public health interventions. We seek original studies, reviews, and case reports that shed light on how predictive methods and analyses can inform decision-making and improve health outcomes. Potential topics include, but are not limited to:
• Use of mathematical and statistical approaches to simulate disease transmission
• Novel methods for forecasting and early warning systems for disease outbreaks
• Evaluating the impact of vaccination and other preventive measures on disease dynamics
• Analysis of vector-borne disease spread and control strategies under changing environmental conditions
• Integration of socioeconomic and demographic factors in risk assessment models
• Machine learning and AI applications in infectious disease prediction
• Incorporating One Health perspectives to understand zoonotic transmission risks.
We encourage work from local, regional, national, and global partnerships and collaboration among multidisciplinary scientists using multiple methodologies. We ask that authors be careful to use non-stigmatizing/preferred language in their manuscripts as outlined in relevant language guidelines for their respective fields.
Contributions to this Collection will provide valuable insights to guide policy-making and practical solutions in public health. We invite researchers, practitioners, and policymakers to share evidence that advances our understanding of how to better predict and mitigate the impact of infectious diseases on populations, especially those disproportionately affected by health inequities.
This Collection supports and amplifies research related to SDG 3: Good Health and Well-being.
All manuscripts submitted to this journal, including those submitted to collections and special issues, are assessed in line with our editorial policies and the journal’s peer-review process. Reviewers and editors are required to declare competing interests and can be excluded from the peer review process if a competing interest exists.
Publishing Model: Open Access
Deadline: Jan 23, 2026
Empowering the public health workforce
BMC Global and Public Health is calling for submissions to our Collection on advancing the recognition of the public health workforce. This Collection seeks to explore various dimensions of the public health workforce, including its roles, challenges, and contributions to global health outcomes. We invite research that sheds light on the evolving landscape of the public health workforce and its impact on population health, such as:
Training and education programs
Skill acquisition and competency frameworks
Professional development pathways
Strategies for promoting diversity and addressing disparities in the public health workforce representation
Inclusive practices for fostering a supportive work environment
Addressing mental health issues among public health professionals
Strengthening health system infrastructure and human resources planning
Sustainable funding mechanisms for workforce investments
Policy frameworks for regulating the public health workforce
Ethical considerations in workforce management and decision-making
This Collection supports and amplifies research related to SDG 3: Good Health and Well-being, SDG 8: Decent Work and Economic Growth, and SDG 10: Reduced Inequalities by highlighting the importance of a skilled and diverse public health workforce in achieving global health equity and sustainable development goals.
All manuscripts submitted to this journal, including those submitted to collections and special issues, are assessed in line with our editorial policies and the journal’s peer-review process. Reviewers and editors are required to declare competing interests and can be excluded from the peer review process if a competing interest exists.
Publishing Model: Open Access
Deadline: Jan 30, 2026
Please sign in or register for FREE
If you are a registered user on Research Communities by Springer Nature, please sign in