Highlights from Humanities and Social Sciences Communities in April and May 2025

Explore highlights featuring research on chimpanzee learning, political psychology, children grief, mass violence motivations, disaster memory art, and infant development across Humanities and Social Sciences Communities.
Highlights from Humanities and Social Sciences Communities in April and May 2025
Like

Share this post

Choose a social network to share with, or copy the URL to share elsewhere

This is a representation of how your post may appear on social media. The actual post will vary between social networks

Research Communities is where research meets real-world experience, sparks curiosity, and opens new conversations. This April and May, blog posts from the Behavioural Sciences & Psychology, and Arts & Humanities Communities explored everything from how chimpanzees learn to how children grieve online. Whether you're a researcher in related areas or simply curious about the human stories behind science, this round-up compiles fresh perspectives on human behaviour, societal challenges, and interdisciplinary insight. 


A peek into chimpanzees' "schoolyards" 

@Oscar Nodé-Langlois 

 

Oscar Nodé-Langlois highlights in a blog post that wild chimpanzees from the Taï forest develop complex tool-use skills, such as nut-cracking, through prolonged social learning a finding published in Communications Biology. By tracking 35 chimpanzees aged 0 to 10 years, researchers found juveniles observe not only mothers but also tolerant older experts across a 10-year developmental window. This apprenticeship-like system, driven by social tolerance and access to diverse role models, mirrors human childhood learning. These elements may have played a crucial role in human evolution. Dive into the full blog post here.  

“Honest liars” in Congress 

@Stephan Lewandowsky 

 

Did you know politicians can be “honest” while spreading misinformation? This Behind the Paper blog post based on a study recently published in Nature Human Behaviour dives into a paradox: despite making over 30,000 false claims, 75% of Republican voters considered Trump “honest.” Researchers analyzed 8 million Congressional speeches since 1879 and found politicians increasingly swap evidence for phrases like “I feel” or “I believe”. Politicians' reliance on instinct over evidence sparks a chain reaction: stalled legislation, deeper political divides, and a measurable rise in societal inequity. Explore the full blog post written by Stephan Lewandowsky 

 

What do envy and jealousy have to do with mass murder? 

@Keith Minihane 

 

This Behind the Paper post explores the emotional and psychological roots of mass violence through the final writings – “legacy tokens” – left by offenders. Based on a recent study published in Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology, the blog post introduces two distinct profiles: “envy”-type offenders, often younger and status-deprived, who seek recognition and fame; and “jealousy”-type offenders, typically older and socially collapsing, who express regret and seek control. Their legacy tokens, from godlike manifestos to apologies, show their inner world – seeking for meaning, belonging, and attention. Read the full blog here written by Keith Minihane. 

 

Supporting kids in loss 

@Amy Joint 

 

This Q&A highlights Project SKIL, a new study on online Cognitive Behavioural Therapy for grief in children, recently published in the ISRCTN registry. Professor Sarah Egan explains how the programme supports children aged 6–12 dealing with bereavement or other forms of loss such as divorce through engaging, self-guided modules designed with input from young people themselves. Read the full Q&A here to explore a valuable contribution to SDG3 on mental health and well-being. This blog aligns with Mental Health awareness week (12–18th May 2025). Find celebration of this week and blogs on this topic, and more relevant blogs in SDG 3: Good Health & Wellbeing page on the Communities.  

 

Volcano Voices: Co-Creating Memory Through Art at Fuego 

@Ailsa Katharine Naismith 

 Volcano Voices: Co-Creating Memory Through Art at Fuego 

In this arts-based study published in the Journal of Applied Volcanology, researcher-artist Ailsa Katharine Naismith co-created a zine with Guatemalan communities affected by the Fuego volcano. In this blog, Ailsa introduced how illustration can sensitively express untold disaster experiences through interviews and participatory workshops. The project highlights both the power and complexity of combining creative methods with participatory research. Read the full blog 

 

When do babies start walking? 

@Angelica Ronald 

 When do babies start walking? 

This blog post takes you behind the paper recently published in Nature Human Behaviour, exploring how genetics influence when infants begin to walk. The study reveals that genes active in brain regions controlling motor function are linked to the timing of walking and show a genetic correlation with ADHD risk. Interestingly, a genetic tendency toward later walking associates with a lower risk of ADHD, which in turn relates to better educational outcomes. Drawing on data from over 70,000 infants spanning nearly 80 years, this research uncovers complex genetic connections between early motor milestones and later development. Read the full blog to find a message for parents and what’s next for science. 


We’d love to hear what inspired you — leave a comment, like your favourite posts, and share them with others who may be interested. You could also take the survey below to share your thoughts! 

These blog posts offer just a glimpse into the thought-provoking research being shared across Research Communities. Explore more pieces, there’s always more to discover and discuss. 

Further reading: 

 

If you have any questions, get in touch with the team at communities@springernature.com 

Please sign in or register for FREE

If you are a registered user on Research Communities by Springer Nature, please sign in

Follow the Topic

Social Learning
Humanities and Social Sciences > Behavioral Sciences and Psychology > Cognitive Psychology > Learning Psychology > Social Learning
Applied Linguistics
Humanities and Social Sciences > Linguistics > Applied Linguistics
Violence and Crime
Humanities and Social Sciences > Society > Criminology > Criminal Behavior > Violence and Crime
Clinical Psychology
Humanities and Social Sciences > Behavioral Sciences and Psychology > Clinical Psychology
Art History
Humanities and Social Sciences > Arts > Art History
Behavioral Genetics
Humanities and Social Sciences > Behavioral Sciences and Psychology > Biological Psychology > Behavioral Genetics

Your space to connect: The Psychedelics Hub

A new Communities’ space to connect, collaborate, and explore research on Psychotherapy, Clinical Psychology, and Neuroscience!

Continue reading announcement

Related Collections

With Collections, you can get published faster and increase your visibility.

Community voices and volcanic risk reduction: co-production, participatory research, and community-led approaches to risk

This Collection will highlight research and case studies that adopt participatory, community-led, or co-produced approaches to volcanic risk and resilience.

Experience and research into effective volcanic risk reduction highlights the importance of community involvement and community-led approaches to understanding and anticipating risk, as well as effective response, and recovery. Systems and solutions that do not include community needs, can reduce their efficacy, and, at worst disengage those communities, wasting resources and creating risk. Identifying approaches to volcanic risk reduction in partnership with communities can foster community ownership, empowerment, and control; enhancing the resilience of those communities. Co-production of risk knowledge and risk solutions not only result in outcomes that are more meaningful, relevant, and successful, but can also lead to improved understanding of volcanic risk for all parties.

However, developing participation with communities presents multiple challenges: including lack of community resources, time to engage alongside other priorities, language and communication barriers, the need to spark engagement or interest, lack of awareness of community challenges and systemic barriers, etc. Recently, novel approaches to working with communities have been identified to overcome such participation challenges, including citizen science projects, engagement of appropriate facilitators and community leaders, knowledge co-production and resource sharing initiatives. There is also a growing awareness about the importance of ethical and just partnerships: built with an awareness of the prior history of the region, the communities, their cultural practices, and relationships with authorities. By incorporating multiple perspectives of risk and knowledge, particularly those of indigenous peoples, there is greater potential to increase relevance, efficacy, and cultural appropriateness of co-produced systems and solutions. Leveraging different types of knowledge also offers opportunities to set up risk governance approaches that are inclusive, and help to redress power imbalances between stakeholders.

In this Collection we seek to highlight community participation initiatives in volcanic contexts and capture this emerging knowledge. We are interested in articles that address the spectrum of approaches and challenges. This encompasses the spectrum of community engagement from wholly community-led initiatives, through knowledge co-production, to novel examples of successful engagement led by volcano scientists or managers of risk. We particularly welcome reflections on pitfalls and challenges, and even examples of failure. We will also consider many definitions of community: from local communities and populations, through to communities of stakeholders and decision-makers. We thus seek contributions from the broad communities involved in understanding and managing volcanic risk: including physical and social scientists, indigenous researchers, practitioners, policy and planners, emergency managers, central and local government, and local community leaders.

We encourage authors to share experiences and methods for empowering local communities, authorities and partnerships, engaging multiple and diverse stakeholders, understanding local expressions of hazards and risk, and sharing responsibilities, as beacons for the core goals of the SENDAI Framework. Volcanic risk settings are inherently multi-hazard, and can present outstanding exemplars of means to “leave no-one behind” in the context of sustainable development and global environmental change. This speaks directly to the aspirations of both the SENDAI framework and the UN Sustainable Development goals which seeks to eliminate poverty (Goal 1) and share knowledge and education (Goal 4) with all (Goals 5 and 10), for the development of inclusive and sustainable settlements (Goal 11). As such, we also welcome contributions that consider implications of this work for sustainable development in other contexts.

Topics of interest include:

• Research exploring effective approaches to participatory, community-led, and co-produced volcanic risk assessment and management.

• Reviews and application of different tools and methodologies for ensuring community voices in volcanology: e.g., participatory action research, design science, collaborative planning process.

• Descriptions of research design and methodologies to monitor and evaluate the success of such approaches.

• Novel methods and tools that have been used to effectively engage communities.

• Case studies outlining approaches used, challenges, and lessons, including relationship building and management and how the spectrum of participation is determined.

• Indigenous perspectives to risk and risk management in volcanic contexts.

•Ethics of participations: for engagement, for research, for partnerships.

•Reviews of the challenges and barriers (e.g., resources, time, capacity, language differences) and proposed solutions, or examples, to overcome them.

•Tools and approaches to identify community needs.

•Case studies for volcanic risk assessment, forecasts and warnings, evacuation planning, risk reduction or management, resilience building, response, and recovery.

• Other contributions outlining research or case studies of approaches or best practices for fostering participation in the understanding of, and management of, volcanic risk.

Prior abstract submissions are not necessary, however the Guest Editors welcome authors to discuss ideas they may have for manuscripts prior to submission. Springer Nature offers several options for open access fee support, these include institutional open access agreements, reduced fees for waivers for corresponding authors based in lower income countries (as defined by the World bank), and case-by-case waivers or discounts based on financial need. The Journal of Applied Volcanology also has a limited number of Journal-specific partial and full fee waivers that can be assessed on a case-by-case basis based on need. If you are interested in applying, please indicate your interest at the point of manuscript submission and outline your case in your submission letter. More information can be found here.

This Collection supports and amplifies research related to SDG 1, No Poverty, SDG 4, Quality Education, SDG 10, Reduced Inequalities, and SDG 11, Sustainable Cities & Communities.

All submissions in this collection undergo the journal’s standard peer review process. Similarly, all manuscripts authored by a Guest Editor(s) will be handled by the Editor-in-Chief. As an open access publication, this journal levies an article processing fee (details here). We recognize that many key stakeholders may not have access to such resources and are committed to supporting participation in this issue wherever resources are a barrier. For more information about what support may be available, please visit OA funding and support, or email OAfundingpolicy@springernature.com or the Editor-in-Chief.

Publishing Model: Open Access

Deadline: Dec 31, 2025

Data Visualization and Effective Communication in Volcanology: Cross-disciplinary Lessons from Research and Practice

Journal of Applied Volcanology is calling for submissions to our Collection on Data Visualization and Effective Communication in Volcanology: Cross-disciplinary Lessons from Research and Practice.

This collection will highlight effective approaches for visualising and communicating volcanic information: from monitoring data to hazard model outputs, through to risk, impact, vulnerability information, and more.

Effective communication of technical information is critical to enhance the understanding of a volcano’s history, status, or forecast, and is vital for effective risk management. However, it is important not just to consider the aesthetic qualities of visual displays, we must consider how our visualisation and communication choices impact people’s responses to information, including how it may affect their decision performance. The effective display of critical information also impacts trust in the information, and the source of the information, particularly when uncertainty is present. Lessons for effective communication and visualisation can be drawn from numerous fields, including design science, UX, psychology, communication studies, informatics, GIS, data science, etc. Factors that can influence interpretation and use of visualisations include aspects such as volume, colour, graphics, symbology, uncertainty, and integration of local and cultural knowledge. Additionally, with the growth of big data, both AI and deep learning present opportunities and risks in the visualisation and use of complex volcanic information.

In this special collection, we welcome submissions on a range of topics exploring effective information visualisation, considering the full spectrum of approaches to displaying complex science: ranging from effective maps and displays of spatial and three- or four-dimensional information, through to the use of symbology and information products for non-technical users, and beyond. We are interested in papers presenting research studies, case studies, and literature reviews, including evidence for best practice, techniques to identify and evaluate user needs and preferences, evaluation methods, software for visualisation and management of big data, and other topics that support effective communication.

Prior abstract submissions are not necessary, however the Guest Editors welcome authors to discuss ideas they may have for manuscripts prior to submission. Springer Nature offers several options for open access fee support, these include institutional open access agreements, reduced fees via waivers for corresponding authors based in lower income countries (as defined by the World Bank), and case-by-case waivers or discounts based on financial need. The Journal of Applied Volcanology also has a limited number of partial and full fee waivers that can be assessed on a case-by-case basis based on need. If you are interested in applying, please indicate your interest at the point of manuscript submission and outline your case in your submission letter. More information can be found here.

We also invite applications to join the guest editor team for this special collection. If interested, please contact the Editor-in-Chief, Emma Hudson-Doyle.

This Collection supports and amplifies research related to SDG 11: Sustainable Cities & Communities and SDG 13: Climate Action.

Publishing Model: Open Access

Deadline: Jan 31, 2026